Myrialogues

Malcolm Gladwell reviews "Free" by Chris Anderson

2010-02-04T21:10:00.001-08:00

Check out the article here.

I've always been interested in the question of how free digital services like Youtube or GoogleDocs might eventually be monetized. Will consumers accept ads, as long as they continue to get free services? Or will they pay for subscriptions? Esp. relevant how traditional media might be delivered in the age of not-so-New media, including devices like the upcoming iPad

Genius = 1 % inspiration + 99% perspiration

2010-02-04T20:41:00.000-08:00

From New Scientist: How to be a genius.

Also see this blog commenting on the Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert performance.

I might have shared the articles above before but I think it's important enough to share again. The book "Outliers" by Malcolm Gladwell touches on a similar topic, that research seems to show that genius is really 1 percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration. It's interesting to think of this in the context of the Singapore education system, where students are channeled from a young age into "Gifted" education streams on the basis of their high performance on IQ tests. Students in these streams generally receive more education resources and opportunities to develop their talent.

What might be more effective would be for individuals to have their unique talents or interests identified at a young age, and then for the system to provide the appropriate resources and mentors to develop these interests intensely for the rest of their lives. In essence, have more Arts schools, conservatories, science and sports schools.

A potential problem I can see arising from such a practice might be the emergence of castes/classes, and the segregation of society. Still, bearing the lessons of history in mind, I wonder if we can devise a way in this day and age to capitalize on the advantages of such focussed talent development without the creation of classes.

A possible reason why the ST Forums are flooded with personal complaint letters

2009-08-26T01:48:00.000-07:00

If the Straits Times Forums are a reflection of the inner churning of the Singaporean collective consciousness, it would appear that petty and often inane complaints fill our psyche. While many of the articles in our national sheet are generally decent, the forum pages are filled with letters airing personal grievances. I mean, how much do we really need to know or care about someone's poor experience with telemarketers as a nation?

A frustrating discussion with a govt housing agency officer regarding my appeal for a housing loan has yielded a possible reason as to why the ST forums are flooded with personal complaint letters. In a nutshell, I had a lousy experience with a bureaucrat who constantly gave guarded, evasive answers to my questions. The housing officer has ignored my repeated emails and calls. Several of her colleagues spoke in the same, non-committal way, and it seemed like everyone was trying to avoid taking responsibility for anything they said and was unwilling to refer me to anyone who might be able to make decisions. As such, I'm inclined to believe that any complaints I make directly to the agency will NOT get addressed and the only way to get them answered properly might be through a letter to the Straits Times, where the case would receive "national coverage".

I'm now inclined to believe that many Singaporeans believe that no good channels exist for their complaints/questions to be answered. As such, they resort to writing an open, national letter, where the relevant bureaucracies are compelled to give answers because of the profile of the complaint. Some people probably now think of this as a default channel for their queries/complaints, since it is the fastest way to get answers.

While I view this practice as degrading to the ST forum as a national soapbox and lowering the quality of our national discourse, I now understand a little better why people might be compelled to do it. For my case, I will try my best to avoid writing such a letter but further negative experiences may just push me over the edge. In the meantime, I blog...

"High Science" to create new economic niches (blue oceans), rather than compete in crowded old ones (red seas)

2009-06-12T01:13:00.000-07:00

From the ST, June 6, 2009:

FINANCE MINISTRY'S 50TH YEAR

Building more world-class S'pore firms

By Ngiam Tong Dow

THE year 1959 was a fateful one for Singapore. It was granted self-government by the British after 140 years of colonial rule. Other than foreign affairs and defence, the new Singapore Government led by Mr Lee Kuan Yew was free to pursue its own social and economic policies.

Mr Lee chose Dr Goh Keng Swee, the only economist in his team, to be our first finance minister. The Ministry of Finance (MOF) was housed in Fullerton Building. The General Post Office occupied the ground floor; MOF occupied the second to fifth floors.

As MOF alumni, we can be proud of belonging to the pioneering team, led by the inspiring Dr Goh, our minister, and by the late Mr Hon Sui Sen, our permanent secretary. We worked our guts out to pull the economy out of stagnation.

The Finance Ministry that Dr Goh established was not your traditional Treasury. Together with Mr Hon, he created the Economic Development Division to spearhead our economic development. The Economic Development Board (EDB) was set up as the operating arm of this division, tasked with finding jobs for the thousands of young students pouring out of our schools each year.

The EDB was given a grant of $100 million to get going. In return for the freedom to operate, its performance was continuously assessed. It was rated on outcomes more than outputs. The EDB chairman had to report annually the dollar value of the foreign direct investments committed to Singapore. He still does.

MOF's fiscal policy has always been to stimulate growth through investment. As Permanent Secretary (Budget), I accorded higher priority to the development over the recurrent budget. The development budget invests for the future. In the early stages, the development budget was spent mainly on building infrastructure.

Over the last 50 years, we have seen Singapore's budget priorities move from physical infrastructure to defence capability and now, education and training.

Though we are not totally free of 'white elephant' boo-boos, MOF's track record in allocating scarce capital is good. Our current revenue was enough to pay for both operating as well as development expenditure. If the Government were a private corporation, we would have been able to finance all our capital expenditure without a cent of debt.

Was Singapore's MOF more virtuous than our counterparts elsewhere? The fact of the matter is that we did what we did because we had no alternative. Without oil or other natural resources, budget surpluses and CPF savings were our only sources for accumulating reserves. Except in extremis, reserves are not intended to be spent on rainy days of the business cycle. The fundamental role of reserves is to serve as backing for our currency. A stable and convertible Singapore dollar is our lifeline to international trade on which our very survival depends.

In spite of the immense pressures exerted by the rest of Government on the MOF, I would be wary of dipping into our reserves to tide us over the troughs of business cycles. I remember the first global oil crisis of 1972. Mr Hon, by then Minister for Finance, refused to subsidise consumption. He thought it better for Singapore to swallow the medicine of inflation in one gulp. The cost of living index stabilised within 18 months.

MOF's mission as guardian of the national budget will be more challenging in the future. For instance, before we can decide on how to allocate the research budget, we need to have some idea of the knowledge domains that Singapore has a more than even chance to compete in. Is it biotechnology, nano-engineering, solar energy or something else?

Spending on R&D in my view is too narrow a focus as a growth strategy. In any case, we do not have the breadth and depth of talent to compete successfully with the Americans, Europeans, Japanese, Russians, and in the near future, the Chinese and Indians.

We may be able to hire a few superstars to head our research institutions. But a Nobel laureate cannot work in isolation. He or she needs teams of young researchers to do the basic experiments. Young PhDs in China work for a fraction of the wages we pay our young dons at our two research universities. Ms Oliver Lum of Hyflux told me that the core membrane research work of her company was done at Hyflux laboratories in China.

Rather than pursuing high science whatever the cost, we may have to adopt a less lofty approach. We should ask ourselves: What are the knowledge domains we can excel in?

Singapore has a fair track record in building townships, industrial parks, container ports, submersible oil rigs, vocational and technical education and water treatment installations like Hyflux. As the example of Singapore Airlines shows, it is possible to build up a world-scale Singapore company on our own. SIA's founding board had no foreign director or CEO.

The way forward for us is to have the guts to build another 25 world-scale 'SIAs' in the knowledge domains where we have a competitive advantage.

I learnt many lessons in economic policymaking from Dr Albert Winsemius, Singapore's first Economic Adviser. The most valuable lesson he taught me was that you have to do the things that matter yourself.

After pulling ourselves up by our own bootstraps in the pioneering years, we now outsource the CEO jobs to foreign talent. The irony is that when trouble looms, the foreign CEO just dusts off the seat of his pants and walks away with his sign-off bonus negotiated when he first signed on.

I refuse to believe that the Singaporean has so lost confidence in himself.

The pyramids of Egypt were built by the Pharoahs' Hebrew slaves. The Egyptian Pharoenic race is now lost in antiquity. The Jewish Hebrew nation continues to thrive.

Quo Vadis Singapore?

The above is an excerpt of a speech Mr Ngiam, a former senior civil servant, delivered yesterday to mark the 50th anniversary of the Ministry of Finance.

My response:

I see the advantages of leveraging existing capabilities: developmental cost advantage - lower additional infrastructural and training costs. It all seems to make simple dollar sense.

However, what happens what happens when our existing capabilities become increasingly crowded and competitive economic spaces? I examine the examples Mr Ngiam cites:

Manufacturing is our traditional strength, and we have a well-established research institution - SIMTECH - supporting innovation to sustain the competitive edge in that industry. Very obviously though, we aren't going to be sustainably competitive in manufacturing, at least not on the scale of India and China.

Marine technology (oil rig building and ship maintenance) - technologically still dominated by the Scandinavians.

Building townships - is this a sustainable source of income, and will it create jobs for more than a select few??

Vocational training - again, whither the jobs?

So, I believe we have to invest in "high science" to create new economic spaces that are less crowded for us to occupy. The best chance we have of getting good, economically useful innovations is to have enough bright, passionate minds working on important problems.

We do have a fair shot at creating a vibrant scientific community, though we really need to get that critical mass of smart, interested and willing people. Will we be able to get enough people interested in this by tackling smaller, incremental problems? I personally wouldn't be very interested in those.

Disclosure: I'm a scientist-in-training and have a vested interest in seeing the scientific industry prosper in Singapore.

Singapore's Stonewall?

2009-05-02T11:00:00.000-07:00

I just witnessed beautiful and chaotic democracy in Singapore. While I was thousands of miles away in Stanford, the new media (Twitter) channeled the realtime reflections of people on the ground, and made me feel like I was part of this historic event.

Thousands of Singaporeans gathered at Suntec City in an orderly manner to demonstrate their opinions on whether or not secular civil society should be used to push quasi-religious agendas. It was incredible for several reasons:

1. That Singaporeans should care so much about an important topic, any important topic, especially important topics like discrimination against homosexuals, and keeping civil society secular
2. That they were able to organize themselves and engage in non-violent democracy - choosing to vote off the new committee that had taken over by semi-force
3. Immediate, realtime feedback on the process was available via new technology in the form of Twitter. In a short twitter, we get a view of the proceedings colored by the observer's thoughts, and moderate that to get a more general view based on the aggregate of responses.

Is this Singapore's Stonewall? It's not exactly the same thing but some broad themes are similar:

1. Spontaneous civil activism. Well not absolutely spontaneous, considering that both the Old and New Guard had been exhorting people to join the EOGM for weeks. I don't think they could have anticipated the size of the response though, so it was spontaneous in that sense.

2. Activism against discrimination, especially with regard to discrimination against the protrayal of homosexual as neutral, or not.

3. A watershed event in Singapore civil society. It's premature to call it that but if the Government extends the right/privilege to this free democracy other societies (e.g. environmental organizations, arts societies etc), we might be seeing a defining moment in Singapore civil society - when Singaporeans cared enough to stand up and be counted for what they believed in, in a non-violent fashion.

Hopefully, this encourages the government to release their tight control on demonstrations and civil society.

Revamp in the works

2009-04-30T23:56:00.001-07:00

I'm revamping and renaming this blog soon. In it, I will lay out better what I want to write about and name myself. I will probably call it: "Thoughts of a curious mind". Or I could stick with "Myrialogues - Thoughts of a curious mind". I want to rename the blog as I think that will better reflect the intent of having the blog in the first place - as an online repository and record of the many streams of thought in my mind.

This is all part of my plan to take greater ownership of my online persona and to contribute more content. I will:

1. Fill out and constantly update my LinkedIn, Facebook and Google profiles
2. Write more often on this blog, and create a nicer online gallery for my pictures
3. Update the wikis that I control more often

Write!

2008-12-29T10:47:00.000-08:00

I am convinced of the need to write. And to get better at it by practising, by doing more writing.

I've spent the last 3 days holed up at home doing nothing but reading academic papers, conjuring up a novel scientific idea and writing a mock proposal to get it funded, which I will then defend in front of a jury of faculty. Yes, my first, off-topic qualifying exam is looming, and I've been working my ass off preparing for it!

It has been a challenge trying to organize my stream of consciousness into compelling arguments. But I've also realized a smoothened flow of internal dialogue, that the writing got easier halfway through, that my thoughts got clearer and my expression more concise. I really do believe that the actual practice of formalizing my thoughts by writing forces me to give the mental jumble some logical structure, which in turn helps my thinking.

On an off-note, I saw an amusing phrase in the ST today. You can read it here. Quote:

Retrenched workers whose monthly household income are below $2,500, and are assessed to be in need of help, are eligible for the CDC's Interim Coping Package for Economic Downturn (iCope)

Well, the issue of retrenched workers certainly isn't amusing but THAT is one HILARIOUS acronym. Some brilliant civil servant must have thought "iCOPE" would be an apt acronym for the times, and starting with that, tried to generate actual words to fit the acronym. I'm not sure if the acronym is supposed to contain substantially the words it stands for. "Interim Coping Package" indeed!

Focussing on creative goals

2008-11-18T01:21:00.001-08:00

Much of the time when we think about the end, we focus on what we want to be materially - rich, famous, successful, powerful. I have come to realize that these are not active, "creative" goals but rather the passive result of achieving creative goals.

Creative goals usually entail having acquired mastery of specific skills that often lead to the contribution of something unique and useful to society, with emphasis on "mastery", and "unique" and "useful". It is not enough to be merely good at something, one should be great. And society usually rewards "great". "Great" can come in many forms - the great concert pianist, politician, scientist, engineer, plumber even.

I think it is fundamentally important to shift focus from passive end-state goals and plow all my energies into identifying and achieving Creative goals - to be a great writer, to be a great speaker, to be a great scientist, to be a great musician, to be a great thinker. The end-states are peripheral, and the accomplishment of these Creative goals would then be a conduit to achieving those desired end-states.

It is thus also fundamentally important to focus on the process, of putting in the 10,000 hours needed to achieve mastery. Since I am very human and still need sleep, I will have to make careful choices about where I decide to funnel those 10,000 waking hours, rather than indulging my senses in a wide variety of activities as I have been doing.

Writing trivial theories

2008-09-05T05:13:00.000-07:00

A scientific trap to avoid:

"Theorists often write trivial theories because their process of theory construction is hemmed in by methodological strictures that favor validation rather than usefulness" - Weick, 1989: 516

A surprising source: A management article titled "The End of Business Schools? Less Success Than Meets the Eye" in the AMLE journal.

Black Belt Bayesian Quote

2008-09-04T03:36:00.000-07:00

Awesome quote!

"If you’re interested in being on the right side of disputes, you will refute your opponents’ arguments. But if you’re interested in producing truth, you will fix your opponents’ arguments for them. To win, you must fight not only the creature you encounter; you must fight the most horrible thing that can be constructed from its corpse."
-- Black Belt Bayesian

The guilt at my ambition

2008-09-01T10:03:00.000-07:00

After reading Michael Hyatt's blog entry on "Creating a Life Plan", I was just contemplating in the shower what exactly my grand plan in life was. What is the overarching vision that gives purpose to my being? What's the 5-, 10-, heck, 20-year plan?

"To be the first minister of Science in Singapore" was an option that welled up in my mind. I was uncomfortable with that thought. Too personal, I felt, too self-centred. Certainly not a grand vision.

"To cure cancer." That too rang somewhat hollow. A little too general, at least for now. I need something that is at once grand, personally interesting and specific.

I realized that I used to be a lot more outwardly ambitious, arrogant to some. Several painful lessons in social propriety and the need to behave with more consideration, more subtlety, grinded away that young edge. With it too, went some of the bold visions and grand passions. I became more short-/middle-term focussed, not thinking of the long-term very much.

I think I started to feel bad about being ambitious, guilty about being energetic and passionate, and knowing it, in a group of people who weren't so. Along the way, the guilt at my ambition wore it down, and it's been dormant for a while.

But perhaps I'm being harsh on myself. I never really thought of the long-term. It is education, experience and age that have brought these thoughts on me. The Hyatt post is also relevant in light of the recent death of the Wife's father. What do I want to be remembered for? What is my legacy?

I will take the introspective steps needed over the next few days to generate this vision. It is something I have deferred for too long. At least, a restarting of my blog-writing is a good beginning. ;-)

Praying at the pump for oil prices to go down

2008-05-08T22:47:00.000-07:00

The man in the street expresses his/her helplessness at soaring oil prices, here.

I think this quote sums it all up:

Prayer is the answer to every problem in life. We call on God to intervene in the lives of the selfish, greedy people who are keeping these prices high,' Mr Twyman said on the forecourt of the petrol station in a neighbourhood of Washington that, like many of its residents, has seen better days.

Amazing.

Chemists have a sense of humor too

2008-04-16T21:49:00.000-07:00

Stop. Think for a minute. What's the best journal article title you've read?

I think this is one of the better ones I've read thus far:

AsS Melt Under Pressure: One Substance, Three Liquids

Turns out Chemists have a sense of humor too. Particular arsenic chemists. Imagine telling your friends what work on: "Oh, I'm trying to synthesize arsole" (If you didn't get that, read it aloud) or "Yeah, that moronic acid's pretty strong stuff".

Many thanks to Acidflask for this amusing read :)

I LOVE TIME MACHINE

2008-04-02T23:36:00.000-07:00

I'd like to share a personal story that I think holds a valuable lesson. Just yesterday evening, my computer started hanging - I had three browser windows open, 2 office applications, Adobe Acrobat etc, the stuff I usually have running in 6 windows under Spaces. I held down the power button to switch it off, then turned it on again, and it wouldn't boot. All I saw was a gray screen: no elegant apple icon, no friendly spinning wheel. I thought it was just misbehaving and so I turned off my computer, took out the battery, reset the Power Management Unit, put everything back together and restarted. I still got only the Gray Screen of Death (GSOD). I tried this multiple times and still only the GSOD came up.

It was highly depressing, since the computer is my lifeline, as I'm sure it is for you: I do everything on it, including (esp.) research. I brought it down to the Apple Genius Bar today and they offered me 2 scenarios: the logic board had gone crazy, or the harddisk was corrupted. The logic board would take 7-10 days to replace, and the harddisk 3 -5 days. I almost wept, since losing my computer is like chopping off my arm (and more).

I didn't feel so bad though, because I had backed up everything using Time Machine. Just prior to my computer failing, Time machine had run faithfully as always, backing up my entire file system. As such, if needed, I could restore the entire system from my external harddisk. So I was distressed at the prospect of losing my computer for a few days, but at least I wasn't distraught at having lost years of completely irreplaceable data.

To cut a long story short, turns out it was the harddisk that was problematic and not the logic board. They quoted me a 3-5 day turnaround time still to install the harddisk, but I wheedled them to find out if they had any harddisks on hand to install it right away. Turns out they actually did have ONE, so they installed it for me, I got my mac back this evening, and restored my entire filesystem in an hour from Time Machine. Time Machine really restores EVERYTHING: when I started my browser again, it even remembered the last few tabs I had open before the computer died on me.

Elapsed time of ordeal: 24 hrs. Emotional state: disturbed, but happy to have my computer back in its literal entirety, and loving Time Machine.

Lessons learnt:
1. BACKUP EVERYTHING FREQUENTLY. Take advantage of Time Machine if you haven't - buy an external harddisk, link it to your computer and have it run in the background, backing things up all the time. It's DEFINITELY a worthwhile investment. This is the second time in my mac ownership history a harddisk has failed on me (interestingly enough, both times were in Stanford - once in 2003 when I was a tourist and now). Time Machine is good enough for most purposes but if you're extra kiasu you can make cloned bootable images of your harddisk from programs downloaded online.

2. BUY APPLECARE. I hope you can still do this, if you haven't already. Extended warranties aren't necessary for most things, but I've found them to be terribly useful for notebooks.

3. If you happen to be unfortunate enough to have to send your computer in for servicing and find yourself without a computer for use, you can take advantage of the Apple Store's return policy to get a "loaner" computer - buy a brand new notebook, use it and return it for a full refund within 14 days. Hopefully, you have your Time Machine backup with you and you can restore your system to use on the loaner, then back it up and transfer it back to your repaired laptop when necessary.

4. If you've important documents, email them to yourself online so you have an additional online backup as well that's accessible everywhere. This was another reason why I didn't feel too horrible when my computer died: my important docs are all online, my calendar's online etc etc.

5. Backup everything frequently. 'nuff said.

I LOVE TIME MACHINE.

My beef with the ST

2008-03-17T22:46:00.000-07:00

Mundaneity.

Singaporean news (from the ST) reads differently from international news feeds. That may be a good thing - Singaporean journalists have perhaps developed a certain Singaporean rhythm to their writing. Also, the content is local, and reading descriptions about local events, people, in local contexts renders the Singaporean in foreign lands homesick and keeps him/her engaged.

I find a distinctive feature of Singaporean news (through the ST) though, is its preponderance with mundaneities. That is not to say their news coverage is completely trivial. Their foreign news content is acceptable, though often careful not to offend allies - hence, little unfavorable reporting of Chinese politics (though they have a field day with Malaysian politics). Also, the financial section is often technically detailed and quite extensive, which may appeal to those so inclined.

The Forum page is perhaps a microcosm of their focus on mundaneities. The page is inundated with letters, often complaints, covering bread-and-butter issues. There are (almost always) no political commentaries, reflections on bigger issues, rather terse exhortations that the "Government should act on zzz because zzz" or even personal rants like "why was my club membership suspended"?

I view the forum page as a reflection of the national consciousness, of what's going on in the collective Singapore mind. While issues like "why was the nurse rude at the polyclinic" may be personally important, I hardly consider them important for the national consciousness.

Does this mean that Singaporeans only care about trivialities? A quick trawl through the web for "rejected ST letters" will yield hundreds of results. Many of the letters are probably just as trivial as those accepted, but many are well-written reflections or commentaries on important issues. Case-in-point: this political commentary written by well-known local ecrivaine Catherine Lim on Democratizing the Lee Kuan Yew system of Governance. A flamboyantly written but incisive reflection on the important issue of our socio-political system, rejected by the ST in favor of exhortations to "exploit technology to solve causeway jams". No kidding.

Perhaps the ST is giving the market what the market wants. However, if we are to raise the level of discourse in the country, as well as the political maturity of the people, the national soapbox has to stop inundating the national consciousness with mundaneity.

Use super-categories in to-do lists

2008-02-10T22:34:00.001-08:00

I've frequently found to-do lists somewhat difficult to maintain. Here're some of the issues I grapple with:

(1) Format: What format should one keep the to-do list in? Daily? Weekly? Monthly? Some tasks can be completed within the day while others require more than that.

(2) Updating: Tasks may also have differing deadlines and priorities. It is pretty inconvenient to keep different lists for tasks with different deadlines or man-hour requirements, so I naturally usually lump everything in one-list, that just gets incredibly worn. When tasks get done, I tick them off. Sometimes, however, tasks are either repetitive (e.g. homework assignments for particular classes, grocery shopping, cooking dinner) or don't get done even after a new list is needed. These tasks often have to be copied onto the new list, something that is troublesome to have to do.

(3) Portability: A dynamic to-do list compels one to carry the latest version around all the time. However, previous versions may contain useful information, or uncompleted tasks. It can be onerous to both keep copying uncompleted tasks to new lists, or to physically carry around all versions of a to-do list.

The best to-do list would have a format that transcends date-time limitations, gets around the hassle of recopying undone tasks, and would be portable. I propose creating to-do lists with super-categories. Examples of super-categories could be: home, finance, classes, lab/work, entertainment, music/hobbies, readings etc.

These to-do lists could comprise post-it notes, or (small) index-cards held together by a hole-binder. I chose these media for their flexibility - imho, nothing is more flexible than the pen and paper. Each super-category would go on one post-it or index card. That way, repetitive tasks like "cook dinner" or "buy groceries", or tasks that are difficult to fit with specific deadlines like "practice guitar" would not have to be recopied from note to note. When all the tasks on a post-it or card gets completed, one simply peels away the post-it or discards the card and replaces it with a new one.

The other possible advantage of having this list that it gets one to think in terms of the super-categories, rather than in nitty-gritty tasks. One could just cycle quickly through the categories, and prioritize on the tasks that need to be done depending on the context or amount of free time available. It also helps us to quickly consolidate at any moment our general situation, and reflects our priorities and interests. It may help us identify areas that we haven't paid much attention to recently, and to take action to address that.

I'll try this out and see if it works! ;) Let me know what you think of this!

Update 21 Feb 08: Seems like someone else at productivity blog LifeClever has come up with a similar idea! Read about it here.

Pope says some science shatters human dignity

2008-01-31T22:52:00.000-08:00

Rant below:

Yet another condemnation of science from the religious quarter. From the Pope, no less. The crux of the matter that he raises is that sciences that tweak with life itself "shatters the concept of human dignity". Don't all sciences tweak with life, or at least some extension of it? Does not humanity progress, as a result? When we build our artificial caves, when we attempt to fly off the surface of the Earth for international or interplanetary destinations, when we breed plants or animals for goodness sake, are we running counter to nature?

Looking at history, it seems inevitable for the religion to argue for the "conservative" status-quo as moral and new technology for which society hasn't yet come to terms with as "evil". When Galileo removed the Earth from the center of the solar system, his work was considered heretical and must have struck at just the same center of "human dignity". It will likely be just a matter of time before such technology becomes overwhelmingly accepted and pervasive, and the Church invents a new codex to accomodate these advances.

Food for thought - keeping it simple, keeping it real

2008-01-26T23:20:00.000-08:00

Feeling burnt-out? Stressed? Feel a need to keep yourself constantly occupied and busy shopping for items you don't need, 'cause once you stop you'll hear the gnawing of the emptiness and loneliness within?

Here's some timely advice:
1. Make space, keep the space and enjoy the space
2. Do one thing at a time
3. Keep it simple
4. Enjoy your life - the best things in life are free.

I'm not trying to be ironic, but these are worthy goals to strive for this new year!

Move over US -- China to be new driver of world's economy and innovation

2008-01-26T09:50:00.000-08:00

In the face of flagging NSF/NIH grants, coupled with post-911 immigration restrictions and a tepid domestic reception to science education and issues like stem cell research, much has been made of the US beginning to lag behind in scientific research. This study by Georgia Tech indicates that China is a leading contender:

The study’s indicators predict that China will soon pass the United States in the critical ability to develop basic science and technology, turn those developments into products and services – and then market them to the world. Though China is often seen as just a low-cost producer of manufactured goods, the new “High Tech Indicators” study done by researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology clearly shows that the Asian powerhouse has much bigger aspirations.

I was surprised to read that China now leads the world in the publication of nanotech articles, though the US still produces more citations per article, which speaks of the quality of US publications and is probably what counts more in academia.

As posted previously though, education has traditionally been highly prized in Chinese society, and coupled with China's push on training scientists and engineers who conduct the research needed to maintain technological competitiveness, suggest that it will continue to grow its ability to innovate. In the United States, the twin forces of declining math and science education performance and strong immigration controls may result in decreased research personnel and technical innovators.

It would be interesting to see if societal and cultural change will accompany this blossoming of the creative technical industry in China. Until a further opening up occurs, with active encouragement of independent thought, I'm uncertain their progress will be more than a trickle. Creativity needs a dynamic environment on which to feed - probably these environments already exist in micro-pockets outside the reach of the PRC police. An increase in personal freedoms, accompanied with economic progress and the flowering of the creative industries, would be China's biggest gain and it's triumphant maturation on the global economic scene.

Same goes for Singapore, I hope.

Cooks Illustrated

2008-01-25T00:08:00.000-08:00

Here's an interesting site for those foodily-inclined: go check out Cook's Illustrated! I just watched a few of their vodcasts - no-knead bread version 2.0, easy beef and veggie soup, easier butter cookies, an in-depth review of cast iron pans. These vodcasts are free at the iTunes store.

It wasn't just a plain-ol' recipe show - the vodcasts were chock-full of interesting scientific facts about food, for instance, how kneading aligns the protein strands in flour to form a gluten matrix that gives restaurant-style bread its texture. They also manage to pepper their show with helpful tips on knife technique, cookware maintenance, and even cookware reviews!

Their method was scientific and rigorous - their tests had the full complement of controls, standardized equipment, ingredients and even microenvironments. The obsessiveness with detail would certainly do any scientist proud. They analyse every recipe and come up with several different conditions under which the recipe might work, then analyse why some conditions cause failure.

Definitely a site worth checking out for more informed shopping and a rational approach to cooking! After all, if you're going to cook, might as well do it right, and know what you're doing! While most of the articles are open only to subscribers, some articles are free and clearly denoted as such. Shared subscriptions, anyone?

p.s. another book I highly recommend dealing scientifically/rationally with l'art de Cuisine Harold McGee's "On Food and Cooking".

Don't worry, Be (moderately) Happy!

2008-01-24T23:34:00.000-08:00

Just read this new report on how "moderate happiness" may be preferable to full-fledged elation. In sum, happiness is certainly preferable to un-happiness, and the state of being happy brings a whole host of benefits: health, success, and even more endorphin-rush-inducing-happiness and general well-being.

The authors wondered though, about just "how happy is happy enough". They created a 10-point life satisfaction scale, and asked people to score their "degree of happiness". They predicted that mildly happy people (those who classify themselves as eights and nines) may be more successful in some realms than those who consider themselves 10s. They reasoned that "profoundly happy people may be less inclined to alter their behavior or adjust to external changes even when such flexibility offers an advantage." A fair possibility, no doubt.

Interestingly, they found "the highest levels of income, education and political participation were reported not by the most satisfied individuals (10 on the 10-point scale) but by moderately satisfied individuals (8 or 9 on the 10-point scale).”

The 10s earned significantly less money than the eights and nines. Their educational achievements and political engagement were also significantly lower than their moderately happy and happy-but-not-blissful counterparts.

In the more social realms, however, the 10s were the most successful, engaging more often in volunteer activities and maintaining more stable relationships.

Truly, divine discontent is that which drives human progress. It is important to celebrate successes and recognize accomplishment but we should keep striving to try and learn new things, to continually challenge ourselves to grow. Stability would lead to stultification would lead to stagnation and death. Enjoy your grass but keep hungry, and stay foolish.

Prediction Markets: how information flows within an organization

2008-01-24T23:13:00.000-08:00

Finally got to reading an article shared by chiao. It's an NYT article titled "Prediction Markets at Google: A Guest Post" by Justin Wolfers.

Essentially, it touches on how information flows within a corporation. The author, in collaboration with Google employees, found that sitting within a few feet of a person tended to facilitate information flow between those persons. Sitting on the same floor as someone barely had an effect. Demographic similarity was unimportant and shared interests helped facilitate information. Interestingly, employees did not necessarily consider people they traded information with as friends. Also, personal relationships tended to persist, even when people were moved away from former bay-mates.

I was struck by this: it almost seemed like a economic justification for laboratory rotations, a process I'm undergoing now. First year PhD students in US colleges generally rotate among 3 different labs a year, spending about 3 months or so in each. Some argue it is a waste of time, as students may not begin their PhD project until their 2nd year. During each rotation, they're exposed to different projects, methods and probably most importantly, they meet different people in the department. Consider it accelerated department interaction. As such, first-years are quickly inducted into the department and build a network for information trading. This can only be beneficial for future work in the department. The organization as a whole works more efficiently.

I'll leave you with a quote from the author - does this reflect your academic environment? :

I don’t know about your firm, but we academics are too self-important to ever sit in cubicles. Our research suggests that this may be unfortunate, and perhaps many of the best ideas in economics never occur, because the idea is waiting for us at a water cooler conversation at which we never arrive. I would love to see my colleagues brainstorm more often and more freely. If we can’t tear down the physical walls between our offices, how can we all change our workplaces to encourage the free flow of information and ideas?

The Tree of Life loses a branch

2008-01-24T00:56:00.000-08:00

No poetry here - just a report by Norwegian and Swiss Biologists (taxonomists?) who claim to have eliminated a branch of the Tree of Life by joining two previously separated branches of eukaryotes (all non-bacterial/archaeaen organisms), shrinking the number of eukaryotic branches from 5 to 4.

The eukaryotic branches are now:

• Plants (green and red algae, and plants)

• Opisthokonts (amoebas, fungi, and all animals—including humans)

• Excavates (free-living organisms and parasites)

• SAR (the new main group, an abbreviation of Stramenophiles, Alveolates, and Rhizaria, the names of some of its members)

Read the article here.

-Image reproduced from www.apollon.uio.no-

Streamlining my Gmail Inbox

2008-01-23T23:11:00.000-08:00

As part of my drive to "Get Things Done -GTD" (read earlier post on this), I tried yet another handy Lifehacker tip: Empty your Inbox with Gmail and the Trusted Trio.

In a nutshell, the article exhorts trying to attain an Inbox with zero mail in it, creating a Trusted Trio of folders called "FOLLOW UP", "HOLD" and "ARCHIVE" and funnelling all mail into those folders. All mail in "FOLLOW UP" are mail that have to be tackled in the near future, that can't be done in 2 minutes (if it could be answered in two minutes, just do it already!). For "HOLD" mails, you're waiting on replies from others, or they contain information about events that have yet to come to pass or. Since Gmail already has a built in Archive function, we use that as the archive folder.

I did the following:

1. Searched my mail box for all mail digests that I get on a regular basis, and for which there is no archival need. These included NYT.com news digests, Friendster updates, etc. Clicked Delete - voila! My mailbox was down to a healthy 3550 messages. My system felt cleaner already.

2. Created the labels "_FOLLOW UP" and "_HOLD", with the 'underscores' to place them on top of the labels list. Also made "Good to know" and "Readings" labels to classify mail containing interesting/useful information (discounts, subject guides etc) as well as mailed interesting articles.

3. Looked through my still-cluttered inbox back along a timeline of a couple of weeks. Identified items that fell under the above labels, and classified them as such.

4. Looked at "Starred" list, labeled mails accordingly then de-starred them. Now my "Starred" list contains important/interesting email that doesn't fall under any other category.

5. Selected all mail in inbox, clicked "Archive" and hey presto! My Inbox was completely empty!

It felt a little strange at first staring at an empty inbox, after more than a year of starting using Gmail and having thousands of mail in it all the time. Oh well, I could try this scheme out and see if it really unclutters my mental slate and boosts my productivity by reducing the amount of email I have to face. Else, there's always the "Unarchive" button, though I doubt I'll go that route.

Certainly, there're those who might argue that with the amount of free storage available (6349 MB and counting..), there really is no need to Archive mail in Gmail. I used to think that too but after having done the above, an empty inbox does seem pretty elegant and liberating. I'll try and check back a while later to see if this has enhanced my life.

Now to tackle my cluttered OS desktop...;-)

Pandora Internet Radio - J'aime bien!

2008-01-21T23:05:00.000-08:00

The title says it all. I found out about Pandora's internet music streaming service, ironically, through a Lifehacker article about "Globalpandora.com", a site setup to bypass Pandora's US-only playback restrictions.

Pandora is run by the Music Genome Project, a rather strangely-named "company of musicians". It is an internet radio-style music streaming service with a surprisingly expansive music collection.

The biggest draw for me is their customisable music "stations". Users are able to create their own stations by specifying which artistes they like. These artistes then become the "seeds" for their new stations. Within seconds, the service plays a song sample from the artiste to verify the user's preference. It then proceeds to play songs that have similar attributes to the seed artiste.

What I found pretty impressive were their very comprehensive musical catalog and cataloging. For instance, I managed to find Corrinne May, a Singaporean chanteuse based in LA who's a personal favorite of the Fiancée. Also, the artistes' styles are very vividly described: "strong acoustic sonority, heavy use of harmonies, drifting riffs of strumming". Certainly, these don't sound like standardized descriptions used to classify music en-masse, but rather like carefully curated song selections by music aficionados. They also include a simple thumbs-up/down ratings system that enables you to train the system to play songs that are really close to what you enjoy hearing. At the end, users can name their stations and share them with others, akin to playlists.

And did I mention that it's all free?

I like the fact that it's highly customisable, internet-based (high portability), free and plays a huge collection of music in high quality. Already, I've heard full-length songs from several artistes that I'd never had the chance to hear elsewhere on my "Damien Rice Radio Station". E.g. Jonas and Plunkett, Mick McAuley and Winifre Horan. Who knows? These may actually lead to purchases

Try it now! 3 thumbs up to a viable radio replacement! :)

Thumbs Race as Japan’s Best Sellers Go Cellular

2008-01-21T18:00:00.000-08:00

As always, Japan is at the bleeding edge of technology-led social change. In the country that gave the world its first novel - "The Tale of Genji" - millenia ago, a new form of novel is taking the charts by storm: the cellphone novel.

The affordability of cellphones coincided with the coming of age of a generation of Japanese for whom cellphones, more than personal computers, had been an integral part of their lives since junior high school. So they read the novels on their cellphones, even though the same Web sites were also accessible by computer. They punched out text messages with their thumbs with blinding speed, and used expressions and emoticons, like smilies and musical notes, whose nuances were lost on anyone over the age of 25.

“It’s not that they had a desire to write and that the cellphone happened to be there,” said Chiaki Ishihara, an expert in Japanese literature at Waseda University who has studied cellphone novels. “Instead, in the course of exchanging e-mail, this tool called the cellphone instilled in them a desire to write.”

Indeed, many cellphone novelists had never written fiction before, and many of their readers had never read novels before, according to publishers.

The article can be found here on the NYT.

China's biotech industry: An Asian dragon is growing

2008-01-20T23:18:00.000-08:00

Long viewed as an artful copier but certainly no innovator, China's foray into the knowledge industries (Biotech here) is inevitable if it is to sustain the roaring growth of its economy. The government has decided to pump money into this ascendant area. Official funding can only go so far though: private venture capital is needed to sustain the long-term growth of the industry. VCs are wary of investing owing to an uncertain financial climate and limited exit strategies.

Notably, the twin Asian giants, China and India, have different strategies regarding biotech: India's efforts are largely on process innovation to improve affordability of existing products while China is gunning for big new products. Both are equally important and laudable and it will be interesting to see which strategy proves to be more successful.

It will also be interesting to see how Chinese scientists might leverage on their vast heritage of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) therapies and use western-style science to legitimize TCM in the international therapy scene, where it is still viewed as pseudo-medicine. Increasingly already, I see many papers on Pubmed on the biochemical mechanisms through which various chinese herbal medicines work on curing diseases. (An example here). The approach works well : Chinese medicine loses its mystical aura and gains from a rational, systematic approach that is verifiable, and the world gains from a vast array of ancient medical knowledge.

The article also discussed returning "sea turtles": Chinese scientists and entrepreneurs trained overseas who return home with scientific talent and international credibility. ("Whales" anyone?) This "reverse brain-drain" was also important for Taiwan's huge dominance in the electronics industry. Might we see the same thing here? Taiwan has had the benefit of an exuberantly democratic political climate though - will China's repressive policies prove to be a stumbling block?

The original Eurekalert article here.

Get Things Done - GTD

2008-01-17T22:34:00.000-08:00

I first discovered the idea of "GTD" from my friend Elia Diodati's ironic post on "Zen Advice". You learn something new every day, particularly with the kind help of Wikipedia.

Getting Things Done (commonly abbreviated as GTD) is an action management method of The David Allen Company, and the title of the book by David Allen which describes the method.

GTD is strictly defined by David Allen on his website [1]. Unlike other time management experts, Allen does not begin by emphasizing setting priorities. Instead, he promotes two key elements in time management — control and perspective. Allen advocates three major models for gaining control and perspective:
A workflow process
A framework with 6 levels of focus
A natural planning method

The first major model is the workflow process, which is used to gain control over all the tasks and commitments which one needs or wants to get done.^[1]^:20 The workflow process consists of five distinct phases:

Collect
Process
Organize
Review
Do

The details of each of the phases are here. I think I do loosely practise this sort of time management but I need to be more disciplined in deciding what I need to do right away. The fiancée would agree.

How to Afford Anything

2008-01-16T21:56:00.000-08:00

Here's a useful something I gleaned from Lifehacker. It's an article on "How to Afford Anything" written by Ken Rockwell, a photographer whose site I visited quite a while back when I was surveying the market preparing to buy my first DSLR camera.

The title certainly makes a big promise. Ken makes the distinction between cheap and frugal: cheap is paying the lowest denominator regardless of quality, while frugal is going for quality and making sure you're getting the best deal for that quality. He also reminds readers to take a good hard look at their lives to see what's necessary, and what's really just a luxury, what's a good investment (things that give you pleasure, have intrinsic value and come at a good price) and what's not (cars in general). Also, that many billionaires are extremely frugal, and unashamed to be so. The best way to be rich is not to have many possessions but to actually have lots of money after all.

The man dispenses his wisdom in an honest manner and drops some gems. For instance, if you're young, to go work on a cruise boat because staff supply is low, demand is high and the pay's great (5 figure salaries for crewmen and 6 figures for a captain!) and that Hawaii and the Caribbean are much better when you have money.

True, true.

Baby steps - the carrot laden path to PhD completion

2008-01-16T21:52:00.000-08:00

A tad early perhaps but hopefully this will come in handy in the future?

From the Academic Productivity blog:-
How to complete your PhD (or any large project): Hard and soft deadlines, and the Martini Method

The argument against Conscription

2008-01-16T12:36:00.000-08:00

I stumbled across an extremely interesting article on conscription today. The same Bryan Caplan @ Econlib, who below praised Singapore's reduction of employer's CPF contribution as a way of reducing labor costs, asserted that he would not move to Singapore for the simple fact that it has military conscription.

Beyond his lambasting the unpleasantness of military service - "State slavery/full-time Physical Education" - he mentions briefly the existence of textbook arguments against the draft as economically inefficient. Now, that's potentially a rational argument, more substantial than the usual griping I was used to during my time in the same "hell on earth". He links an August 2005 paper by David Henderson titled "The Role of Economists in ending the Draft".

The Henderson paper gives a rather longwinded account of the historical events leading up to the abolishment of the US draft system in the early 1970s. What I found most interesting were the nuggets of economic arguments buried in the history-noise. For instance, one of the first empirical studies of the economics of the draft and of ending the draft was apparently produced by Walter Oi, an econ don then at the Uni of Washington and later at the University of Rochester's Graduate School of Management. Oi argues as follows:

Oi distinguished clearly between the budgetary cost of military manpower and the economic cost. Oi granted the obvious, that a military of given size could be obtained with a lower budgetary cost if the government used the threat of force to get people to join—that is, used the draft. But, he noted, the hidden cost of this was the loss of well-being among draftees and draft-induced volunteers. Using some empirical methods that were sophisticated for their day, Oi estimated the loss to draftees and draft-induced volunteers and found it quite high— between $826 million and $1.134 billion. While this number might seem low today, Oi’s data were in mid-1960s dollars. Inflation-adjusted to 2005, the losses would be $4.8 billion to $6.6 billion.

Other economists who contributed to the literature at the time were Stuart Altman (1969), the late David Bradford (1968), Alan Fechter (Altman and Fechter 1967), Anthony C. Fisher (1969), and W. Lee Hansen, and Burton Weisbrod (1967). Their articles appeared in such prestigious economics journals as the American Economic Review and the Quarterly Journal of Economics. The main idea was that "Conscription is a Tax", elegantly described by William H. Meckling, an economist who was head of the Gates Commission and dean of the University of Rochester's Grad Sch of Management, below. In essence, he argues that the opportunity-cost of military conscription on the general population is a non-equitable tax that exacts a greater toll on the poor than the rich. The actual paragraphs are reproduced below:

Any government has essentially two ways of accomplishing an objective whether it be building an interstate highway system or raising an army. It can expropriate the required tools and compel construction men and others to work until the job is finished or it can purchase the goods and manpower necessary to complete the job.

Under the first alternative, only the persons who own the property seized or who render compulsory services are required to bear the expense of building the highway or housing project. They pay a tax to finance the project, albeit a tax-in-kind. Under the second alternative, the cost of the necessary goods and services is borne by the general public through taxes raised to finance the project.

Conscription is like the first alternative—a tax-in-kind. A mixed force of volunteers and conscripts contains first-term servicemen of three types—(1) draftees, (2) draft-induced volunteers, and (3) true volunteers. Draftees and draft-induced volunteers in such a force are coerced into serving at levels of compensation below what would be required to induce them to volunteer. They are, in short, underpaid. This underpayment is a form of taxation. Over 200 years ago, Benjamin Franklin, in commenting on a judicial opinion concerning the legality of impressments of American merchant seamen, recognized the heart of the issue, and even estimated the hidden tax. He wrote: “But if, as I suppose is often case, the sailor who is pressed and obliged to serve for the defence of this trade at the rate of 25s. a month, could have ₤3.15s, in the merchant’s service, you take from him 50s. a month; and if you have 100,000 in your service, you rob that honest part of society and their poor families of ₤250,000. per month, or three millions a year, and at the same time oblige them to hazard their lives in fighting for the defence of your trade; to the defence of which all ought indeed to contribute, (and sailors among the rest) in proportion to their profits by it; but this three millions is more than their share, if they did not pay with their persons; and when you force that, methinks you should excuse the other.

“But it may be said, to give the king’s seamen merchant’s wages would cost the nation too much, and call for more taxes. The question then will amount to this; whether it be just in a community, that the richer part should compel the poorer to fight for them and their properties for such wages as they think fit to allow, and punish them if they refuse? Our author tells us it is legal. I have not law enough to dispute his authority, but I cannot persuade myself it is.

It seems likely though, there are several key assumptions underlying the argument:

(1) a large enough population exists for there to be sufficient numbers of people won over by the monetary incentives to volunteer for the military yet not disable other sectors of the economy.

(2) the supply of people is elastic - the population will respond to incentives to join the military. This is untenable if the population has severe cultural biases against joining the military, like in a population with a majority of Seventh Day Adventists for instance.

Right now, I still can't persuade myself that Singapore's population is big enough for probability to allow a big enough army. Would sufficient incentives (a substantially higher pay, greater prestige) bring in enough people to compensate for the drain from the loss of the draft?

Singapore: "Automatic Stabilizers" Done Right

2008-01-15T09:55:00.000-08:00

Here's some rare praise for Singapore on the international scene. There're some merits to a strong government that isn't afraid to do what's fiscally correct and not what's politically expedient. Strong governments are needed to for harsh corrective measures. For instance, think of India's feticide problems: strong laws and active enforcement are needed to break the cruel cycle that roots in the unreasonable dowry each family pays for its girls to be married out, and which ends in active sex selection and feticide.

In a sense, Singapore's government really does strive for the best of both worlds - a strong government with pervasive societal influence and active spending on it's people but also pro-business.

Now, if only the Singapore government would release the wing-clips on the population's political maturity...different forms of government for different stages of a society's growth eh?

From Bryan Caplan @ Econlog,

Imagine my surprise, then, when I discovered that Singapore has figured out a stunningly clever way to use tax cuts to reduce unemployment. Instead of focusing on stimulating demand, Singaporean tax policy hits the margin that matters: labor costs. When there is a surplus of labor, they cut employers' share of the payroll tax (known in Singapore as the CPF). Details appear in Henri Ghesquirre, Singapore's Success:

The government directly intervened to temporarily lower the cost of business in Singapore through... its power to lower the CPF contribution rate of employers...

Elsewhere, substantial nominal currency devaluation is often the last and only resort in the face of downwardly sticky nominal wages, often with higher inflation as an undesirable side effect. In contrast, Singapore uses the direct intervention methods at its disposal. In addition, there is built-in wage flexibility, because an important portion of workers' remuneration is automatically lowered if GDP falls short of target.

With flexible wages, of course, it doesn't matter who legally pays the a tax. But the whole problem with recessions is that wages are somewhat sticky - you can have surplus labor for years before wages fall enough to restore full employment. By cutting employers' share of the tax, the Singaporeans greatly speed up the wage adjustment process.

We should expect the Singaporean system to work very well. Suppose we conservatively assume that labor demand elasticity is only -.4. Then a 1 percentage-point cut in employers' share of the payroll tax will roughly increase employment by .4 percentage-points. With a more optimistic elasticity of -1.0, every percentage-point cut in taxation would raise employment by 1 percentage-point. This approaches the Lafferian dream of tax cuts that fully pay for themselves. (In savings-obsessed Singapore, unsurprisingly, they also raise the payroll tax during booms).

The original article can be found here.

A New Day

2008-01-15T09:48:00.000-08:00

Out the Door,
the Night's talk still fresh in my head.
The world seems different somehow; softer.
It's cold,
but not unpleasant.
The mists shroud
the harsh earth -
a pall on my discontent.
Gazing through the gauze
into today's future
as I move bravely forth, happier still.
Who knows what today will bring?

Breaking the impasse

2008-01-14T21:59:00.000-08:00

Here - my first post! Fleetingly written to quickly break the mental impasse that's damming the torrents of thoughts withheld mentally.

I had plans to produce an auspiciously literary gem for a first post. However, all those castles in the air were quickly causing inertia, a reluctance to actually post something for fear it wouldn't live up to its designer's grand designs.

This blog will be a digital repository for my reflections, ruminations and shared readings. It may contain random observations and photographs. It is a bid to mature creatively from a passive consumer of information to an active producer of content.

So here it is - and let the games begin!